| 
 
The Fighting Chiefs and the 
F2A 
USS Lexington Brewsters 
  
by Joe Lyons 
  
  
  
  
HyperScale is proudly supported by Squadron 
  
  
The Aircraft 
Fighting Two (VF-2) was a 
unique USN Squadron in the early 1940s. Most of its members were 
non-commissioned officers (hence the Squadron’s insignia) and, it would be the 
only CV Squadron to operate the Brewster F2A after the US entered the war. This 
article looks at the two versions of this airplane used during the period 1940 
into January 1941, the F2A-2 and the F2A-3. Home for the Brewsters at sea of 
course was USS Lexington (CV-2).  
[To my knowledge these aircraft were not known as 
“Buffalos” in USN service, at least during the period addressed, so the name 
will not be used herein]  
The chequered development and career of the F2A is well 
covered in many sources. Suffice it to say that it was the navy’s first 
monoplane fighter, saw little combat with that service and was replaced by the 
F4F immediately after the war began in the Pacific. 
 
  
Brewster F2A-2 (BuNo 1416) [VF-2, “2-F-11”] 
This particular ‘Buff version was as close as the west came 
to building a Zero: 
  
	
		| 
		  Aircraft  | 
		
		 Fuel  | 
		
		 Armament  | 
		
		 HP  | 
		
		 Loaded Weight  | 
		
		 Wing Area- ft2  | 
		
		 lb/hp  | 
		
		 Wing Loading-lb/ ft2  | 
	 
	
		| 
		 Zero Type 21  | 
		
		 120 Imp Gal  | 
		
		 2-20mm2-7.7mm  | 
		
		 940  | 
		
		 5313 lb  | 
		
		 247  | 
		
		 5.65  | 
		
		 21.5   | 
	 
	
		| 
		 F2A-2  | 
		
		 200 gal  | 
		
		 4-.50 cal  | 
		
		 1200  | 
		
		 5913 lb  | 
		
		 206  | 
		
		 4.95  | 
		
		 28.7  | 
	 
 
  
Neither had any sort of passive protection. USN sources 
generally consider the –2 to be the best of the Brewster fighters (Boyington 
said it could “turn inside a phone booth”). By contrast the export version 
traded performance for passive protection, as did the navy –3. BuNo 1516 was 
built in VF-2 markings and got to VF-2 in October 1940, remaining with the 
Squadron until replaced by the F2A-3 in September 1941. Note the 200 gal of fuel 
inside a 6000 lb loaded airframe. This was 70 gal more than the P-40 and over 
twice as much as carried by Spitfire, Hurricane and Bf-109 contemporaries. It 
was overhauled in December 1941, served briefly with VMF-111 and 121 and was 
stricken in October 1942 at NAS Miami. While with VF-2 its Brewster ancestor, 
the F2A-1 dressed in Finnish markings, was on the way to setting several 
unmatched WW II fighter records. Mustang, Spitfire and Dora aficionados?  
Eat your hearts out. 
29 different F2A-2s were assigned to VF –2 at one time or 
another. I can find only one photo of a Golden Wings VF-2 F2A-2 (BuNo 1412), 
other than what is factory publicity shot possibly of 2-F-1.  There is one other 
photo of an ex-VF-2 bird in July 1942. This photo shows BuNo 1412. Note the 
target “can” on the port bomb rack. 
 
  
F2A-3 BuNo 1549 (2-F-18)     
Painted Blue-Gray over Light Gray.  
 The entire air group 
would be so painted until such time as the December 23 directive on rudder 
stripes was implemented. I have found two photos of VF-2 ‘Buffs in Blue-Gray 
where the Squadron markings are visible; neither is cross-referenced to a Bureau 
Number. But Thomas Doll’s new book on navy markings has a color drawing of 
2-F-18 and a photo that shows AP 1/C Howard S. Packard standing in front of it 
(perhaps).  
The –3 Brewster will add more fuel, and armor, but no more 
horsepower. Like all its contemporaries designed on the cusp of the war it has 
the wing lumps and bumps to accommodate weapons for which they were not 
intended. Performance will suffer compared to earlier versions, but navy pilots 
in a position to evaluate both types saw little difference between this F2A and 
its F4F peer. VF-2 will be the only navy Squadron to fire the guns of this 
airplane in anger. 
  
The conventional wisdom of the F2A/Buffalo is that it was a failure as a 
fighter, except in the hands of the Finns. However, I believe a case can be made 
that the USN would have been better off in the great 1942 carrier battles with 
the F2A rather than the F4F. How dare I say this? More gas for one thing: 200+ 
gal vs. 130. The Wildcat’s range limitations are very manifest in the accounts 
of those days. And, perhaps a faster rate of climb depending on which source you 
believe. No match for the Zero on the Zero’s terms to be sure, but neither was 
the F4F. 
  
  
 
F2A-2 
  
The Tamiya kit is currently the only game in town in 1/48 scale. It is built 
almost straight from the box, except for some True Detail photo-etched parts. 
Given the closed canopy, I really shouldn’t have bothered with the P/E. Eduard 
provides a delightful D/F antenna to wrap around the life raft; regrettably 
neither the kit nor the Falcon canopy can be installed with it in place, so it’s 
not.  
  
  
  
  
  
As with all VF-2 Brewsters, BuNo 1516 does not have the antenna mast, the aerial 
being led instead to a stub on the port wing.   
  
  
  
F2A-3 BuNo 1549 (2-F-18).  
  
This is the Tamiya F2A-2 kit modified to be a –3.  
  
The 
principal change is the 10” fuselage extension forward of the vents on a line 
with the antenna mast. This is a straightforward job. After assembly of the 
completed fuselage, the cowl is detached from the nose with a razor saw. 10 thou 
plastic sheet extensions were glued into the fuselage to provide support for 20 
thou plastic sheet representing the nose extension. The whole lot was faired in 
with putty. There is a small bit of panel line scribing necessary to make the 
extension blend with the fuselage proper, and then the cowling is reattached. Eduard open split flaps. An open Falcon canopy justifies the Eduard P/E set, 
mostly of the cockpit. When combined with some kit parts the cockpit is a good 
copy of the photos the F2A prototype cockpit. This set caters for all the 
pre-F2A-3 aircraft, USN and export. I’m presuming it is adequate for the –3 as 
well. I used a Curtiss cuffed prop from the spares box, left over I think from 
an abortive KMC Wildcat conversion. 
  
  
  
  
  
A Monogram B-17 Cyclone replaces the kit engine which, while good, like all of its 
modeling brothers is molded smaller than scale to fit the kit cowl. Judicious 
cutting away of the B-17 engine in areas not visible when closed up made its use 
possible. 
  
The only other substantial visual points on VS-2 F2A-3s are the frameless 
sliding canopy and the rerouting of the radio antenna much as was done with VS-2 
F2A-2s. While there are no metal frames on the canopy, the butt joints of the 
Plexiglas sections are not invisible. I added Accurate Miniature 100 lbs and 
racks leftover from the F3F-2 kit.  
  
  
  
F2A-2  
  
The “Golden Wing” era had its own rules, many of which have 
puzzled modelers for years. Fortunately, there was very little artistic license 
allowed among aviation activities required to conform to directives, and we have 
a good deal of photographic documentation. 
  
By directive, the golden wings officially disappeared on December 31, 1940 but 
as anyone who has watched “Dive Bomber” knows it took some months to fully 
implement the replacement scheme. Thus in January 1941 for all the aircraft 
addressed, the exterior coloration was: 
  
Aluminum-pigmented lacquer overall, except the tops of the wings. Floquil Old 
Silver used on all the metal surfaces. The 1937 reorganization of Squadrons had, 
inter alia, standardized color markings for each carrier, such color being 
applied to all the tail surfaces. Lexington’s color was Lemon Yellow, a 
paler shade than Orange-Yellow. Testors Model Master Blue Angel Yellow was used 
for this color. Kit decals were used, with the various kit numbers “juggled” 
about to provide the correct BuNo and section numbers for this particular 
aircraft. 
 
  
F2A-3   
The Blue-Gray for upper surfaces 
officially implemented in November 1941 but done unofficially a few weeks before 
in parts of the Pacific naval air force.  National insignia remains the blue 
star on a white circle with the red center dot. Testor’s MM Blue Gray and Light 
Gray. White Markings and numerals from aftermarket sheets. I had finished this 
model when I got the Aircraft Films F4F Wildcat DVD set containing the film 
clips mentioned above. As I watched, it seemed as if the F2As viewed head-on “in 
the groove” were overall light gray, but as they trapped or executed wave-offs, 
it was obvious they were in Blue-Gray/Light Gray. A careful look at two still 
close-ups of the time seem to show the Light Gray coming up around the entire 
cowl ring causing the head-on overall gray look.  So, I repainted the model 
thusly. 
  
  
  
In the Great Panel Line Shading debate, I subscribe to the 
theory that if the panel was not openable on purpose, it does not get shaded. I 
usually do this with black or gray pastel chalk on top of the base color. I have 
no clue as to how do successfully any of the more glamorous techniques 
  
  
  
 
 
a.                  
Brewster’s Benighted Buffalo. AIR Enthusiast Quarterly Number One. 
b.                 
Doll, T.E. (1967). U.S.Navy Markings W.W. II-Pacific Theater. Sun 
Valley CA: John W. Caler. 
c.                  
Doll, T.E. (2003). US Navy Aircraft Camouflage & Markings 1940-1945 
 Carrollton TX: Squadron/Signal Publications 
d.                 
Mass, J ((1987). F2A Buffalo in action. Carrollton, Tx: Squadron/Signal Publications 
e.                  
Shores, C.F. (1970). The Brewster Buffalo Profile 217. Windsor, 
Berkshire, England: Profile Publications Ltd. 
f.                   
 http://www.danford.net/buff.htm 
       
All photos USN or the author 
  
  
Click the thumbnails below to view 
the images full-sized. 
Use your browser's Back Arrow to return to this page: 
 
Text Copyright © 2004 by
Joe Lyons 
Images by USN or Joe Lyons 
Page Created 01 January, 2005 
Last Updated 
01 January, 2005 
Back to Reference Library
 
       |